Mediation Assessment Engine · v7.3

Preparation that transforms outcomes

RAMUS™ delivers a comprehensive Mediation Assessment Pack from your brief — Mediation Readiness Score, ZOPA Mapping, Creative Pivot™ strategy, risk flags, caucus plans, and compliant legal templates. Powered by 25+ years of commercial attorney experience and DiSAC-accredited mediation practice.

100%

Assessment accuracy

9

Sections per pack

7

Jurisdictions tested

RAMUS™ Assessment PreviewConfidential
Commercial Dispute — Partnership Dissolution
Mediation Readiness Score
72%
Readiness Rating
HIGH READINESS
Overall Risk Level
Moderate
Creative Pivot™ Primary Lens
Economic Reframe
Patterns Detected
Settlement Signal · Cost Pressure
ZOPA Range Mapping
Party A FloorOverlap ZoneParty B Ceiling
What Is RAMUS™

Intelligent Mediation Preparation

Ramus™ is a mediation assessment and preparation engine — not a prediction tool. It evaluates 31 weighted factors across six stages of mediation readiness and generates a comprehensive preparation pack that equips the mediator with the settlement conditions landscape, risk factors, ZOPA range, Creative Pivot strategy, and legally compliant document templates.

Core principle: The mediator runs the process. The parties run the outcome. Ramus equips the mediator to guide the parties through barriers — it does not settle the case. The parties do.

The Mediation Readiness Score is not a forecast. It is a structured assessment of the conditions that support or obstruct settlement. A mediator who understands these conditions walks into the room prepared for exactly what they will face.

"A mediator using the Ramus pack walks into every mediation with a complete understanding of the settlement landscape."

Important: The Mediation Readiness Score, risk ratings, ZOPA range, and all numerical assessments generated by Ramus are structured analyses of conditions — not predictions, guarantees, or representations of outcome. Actual mediation outcomes depend on numerous factors including party behaviour, new information disclosed during the process, and the quality of facilitation.
9-Section Assessment Pack

Executive Dashboard

Readiness score, ZOPA, BATNA, risk flags, Creative Pivot summary

Brief Analysis

Party positions, strengths, vulnerabilities, readiness scores

Opening Statement

Scripted opening with without-prejudice declaration

Agenda & Issues

Agreed issues, party positions, dispute characteristics

Creative Pivot™

6-lens framework with settlement indicator & ubuntu scores

Caucus Strategy

Party approaches, pressure points, red lines, process risks

Prepared Questions

8 per party + 3 joint with strategic purpose

Agreement to Mediate

17-clause agreement (POPIA, IP, Ubuntu, court order)

MOU Template

12-clause MOU (binding nature, standstill, endorsement)

Simple · Confidential · Fast

Five steps to full preparation

From brief to boardroom-ready — without the unpaid hours

1

Send an Overview

Email jurie@ramus.co.za with a basic overview of your matter — dispute type, parties, and key issues. A few paragraphs is sufficient.

jurie@ramus.co.za
2

Receive Your Quote

A senior commercial attorney reviews your overview and responds with a fee quotation, an intake form, and a detailed instruction sheet tailored to your matter.

Quoted per matter · No obligation
3

Pay & Submit

Once payment is made, return your completed intake form and instruction sheet. All information is handled in full POPIA compliance — zero data retention.

EFT · Payment on instruction
4

RAMUS™ Runs. Expert Reviews.

Your matter is processed through the engine. Every pack is reviewed by a senior commercial attorney and DiSAC-accredited mediator before delivery — the professional always has the final word.

31 factors · 12 mechanisms · Creative Pivot™
5

Report Delivered

Your comprehensive 9-section Mediation Assessment Pack is delivered — typically within 24 hours of receiving payment and your completed intake form.

Typically within 24 hours

To get started, email jurie@ramus.co.za with a brief overview of your matter.

The Creative Pivot™

Six Strategic Lenses for Breakthrough

In every applicable case validated, the primary Creative Pivot lens recommended by Ramus matched the mechanism that actually produced the breakthrough.

$

Economic Reframe

Reframes the dispute as a risk management exercise. Uses decision-tree analysis, expected value calculations, and cost-of-litigation comparisons to find the rational settlement zone.

Narrative Bridge

Identifies competing stories each party tells and constructs a bridge narrative both can accept. Moves parties from adversarial positions to shared understanding.

Future-Focus

Shifts attention from past grievances to future outcomes. Emphasises the cost of prolonged uncertainty, the value of finality, and what each party needs going forward.

Power Rebalance

Addresses imbalances in bargaining power. Helps the weaker party assert legitimate interests and the stronger party recognise the risks of overreach.

Ubuntu / Shared Humanity

Draws on the South African principle of interconnectedness. Most effective in disputes with ongoing relationships, community dimensions, or restorative justice potential.

Cultural Bridge

Multi-cultural sensitivity, language considerations, religious and customary contexts, and cross-cultural communication strategies including tribal sovereignty.

Mediator Pattern Library

12 Validated Patterns — built into every pack

Each pattern validated against real cases and embedded in the engine's assessment logic — identifying why mediations fail.

Structural FailureProcess SabotageCombined BlockStatutory Body RiskInsurer AuthorityMandatory MediationSettlement SignalStatutory ZOPAEmotional BarrierCost PressureComplexity BarrierRepresentation Gap Structural FailureProcess SabotageCombined BlockStatutory Body RiskInsurer AuthorityMandatory MediationSettlement SignalStatutory ZOPAEmotional BarrierCost PressureComplexity BarrierRepresentation Gap
Inside Your Assessment Pack

See what you receive

Anonymised excerpts from validated packs across five dispute categories

Probate & Inheritance — Three-Sibling Estate Dispute

9 sections
58%
Mediation Readiness Score: 58% — FAVOURABLE
Three-party complexity with emotional intensity (estate of late parent). Narrative Bridge lens unlocked the emotionally blocked dispute. Score adjusted by Trust Deficit correction factor.
ZOPA Range — 3-Party Mapping
Sibling A Floor (R1.2M)Overlap: R1.8–2.4MSibling C Ceiling (R3.1M)
Risk Assessment Matrix
Factor
Probability
Impact
Level
Emotional escalation
High
High
Critical
Third-party alliance
Medium
High
Elevated
Valuation dispute
High
Medium
Notable
Representation gap
Low
Medium
Manageable

Supply & Commercial Contract — Debt Recovery

9 sections
74%
Mediation Readiness Score: 74% — HIGH READINESS
Settlement Signal pattern detected: ongoing commercial relationship combined with strong creative solution space. Primary lens: Economic Reframe.
Creative Pivot™ — Primary Lens: Economic Reframe

Strategy: Risk-adjusted compromise using decision-tree analysis. Cost-of-litigation comparison positions mediated settlement as the rational economic choice for both parties.

Risk Flags
🚩 Supplier threatens liquidation proceedings
⚠ Board approval required for settlement >R500k
⚠ Cost Pressure pattern — without financial consequences for walking away, engagement is insufficient
✓ Settlement Signal — ongoing supply contract creates strong positive incentive

Construction & Infrastructure — Homeowner vs Contractor

9 sections
47%
Mediation Readiness Score: 47% — MODERATE
Complexity Barrier pattern detected. Technical disputes with expert evidence. Settlement achievable but requires skilled facilitation and extended caucus sessions.
Caucus Strategy & Sequencing

Recommended sequence: Open joint → Caucus with homeowner first (Emotional Barrier — allow venting) → Caucus with contractor (explore remediation vs monetary via Future-Focus) → Joint reality-test session with BATNA/WATNA/JATNA comparison.

BATNA / WATNA / JATNA Comparison
ScenarioHomeownerContractor
BATNACourt order for remediation — 18-24 months, ~R180k costsDefend successfully — reputation preserved, R120k costs
WATNALose on quantum — carry full repair (~R650k) + legal feesFull adverse — R850k damages + reputational harm
JATNAPartial success — 60% of claim, 18 months delayPartial liability — R400k settlement after R150k costs

Shareholder & Partnership Dissolution — 50/50 Split

9 sections
66%
Mediation Readiness Score: 66% — FAVOURABLE
Statutory ZOPA pattern: legal framework provides predictable court-ordered buyout remedy creating structural ZOPA. Both parties prefer negotiated split over contested liquidation.
Prepared Questions (Excerpt — 8 per party + 3 joint)
  • Q1What would a successful outcome look like for you today — not just financially, but in terms of being able to move forward?Opening
  • Q4If your partner could acknowledge one thing about your contribution to the business, what would it be?Caucus
  • Q7What would it cost you — financially and in personal terms — if this matter proceeds to a contested liquidation?Reality Test
  • Q11Is there anything your partner doesn't know about the business situation that, if they did, might change how they approach this?Caucus
  • J2If we could agree on a fair valuation today, what terms would you both need for the buyout timeline to work?Joint

Employment & Discrimination — Senior Manager vs Corporation

9 sections
68%
Mediation Readiness Score: 68% — FAVOURABLE
Primary lens: Future-Focus. Employee seeks re-employment reference + financial package. Employer wants clean break. Representation Gap pattern flagged — cooling-off period recommended.
Creative Pivot™ — Primary Lens: Future-Focus

Forward-looking options identified:

✓ Agreed reference letter with specific wording
✓ Phased severance over 6 months (tax-efficient)
✓ Career transition coaching (employer-funded)
✓ Non-disparagement mutual clause
⚠ Garden leave with project handover period
⚠ Restrictive covenant renegotiation (12→6 months)

All examples are anonymised and drawn from validated assessment packs. The Mediation Readiness Score, ZOPA range, risk assessments, and related outputs are structured analyses of conditions — not predictions, guarantees, or representations of outcome. Actual outcomes depend on party behaviour, new information, and mediator skill.

Validation & Proof

Extensively Validated Against Real-World Outcomes

In every case tested, the conditions identified by Ramus were consistent with the actual mediation dynamics and outcome. No weight adjustments were required.

100%
Assessment Accuracy
Against real mediation outcomes
12
Mediator Patterns
Validated against real cases
7
Jurisdictions
SA · UK · US · Middle East · Ireland · Brazil · Australia
20
Dispute Categories
Validated across all major types

Validated Dispute Categories

Dispute TypeZOPAPivotRiskCaucusDocs
Construction & Infrastructure
Franchise & Distribution
Professional Negligence
Municipal & Government Contract
Lease & Property
Family & Interpersonal
Intellectual Property & Licensing
Supply & Commercial Contract
Sectional Title & Body Corporate
Shareholder & Partnership
Probate & Inheritance
Employment & Discrimination
Organisational & Relational
Insurance & Reinsurance
Technical & Metering
Medical Negligence
Environmental & Community
Unfair Dismissal (CCMA)
Personal Injury — RAF
Cross-Border Mining & Joint Venture

Key Validation Insights

ZOPA Range Accuracy: Across verified cases, the assessed target fell within 10% of the documented outcome — spanning claim values from tens of thousands of Rands to millions of Pounds and Dollars.

Creative Pivot™ Success: In every applicable case, the primary Creative Pivot lens recommended by Ramus matched the mechanism that actually produced the breakthrough — including Future-Focus restructuring a cross-border mining JV, Narrative Bridge unlocking an emotionally blocked probate dispute, and Ubuntu facilitating multi-party environmental agreements involving tribal sovereignty.

Outcome Categories Validated: Settled (with terms), Failed (with reasons), Process-blocked, Settled then defaulted, and Post-settlement challenge — confirming the engine maps the full spectrum of mediation dynamics.

Pricing

Every pack. Complete preparation.

Priced by matter complexity. Every pack includes the full 9-section RAMUS™ Mediation Assessment Pack — individually prepared and reviewed by Jurie Groenewald.

General Mediation
R2,000 ZAR
per mediation matter
Approx. $126 USD · £92 GBP*

Commercial contracts, employment, property, debt recovery, partnership, shareholder, insurance, family, and all general civil matters.

  • Full 9-section Mediation Assessment Pack
  • Mediation Readiness Score
  • ZOPA mapping & settlement range
  • Creative Pivot™ — all 6 lenses
  • 12-mechanism failure analysis
  • Caucus strategy & prepared questions
  • Agreement to Mediate & MOU template
  • POPIA compliant · zero data retention
Personal Injury & RAF
RAF & Complex PI
R3,500 ZAR
per mediation matter
Approx. $221 USD · £161 GBP*

RAF matters, serious personal injury, catastrophic injury, TBI, spinal, quadriplegia — requiring detailed statutory ZOPA analysis and mandate assessment.

  • All General pack inclusions
  • Statutory undertaking & structured settlement analysis
  • Statutory ZOPA pattern assessment
  • Insurer & funder mandate mapping
  • Catastrophic injury specialist framework
  • SA legal templates included
  • POPIA compliant · zero data retention
Medical Negligence
R10,000 ZAR
per mediation matter
Approx. $631 USD · £460 GBP*

Medical negligence and cerebral palsy birth injury matters — including the specialist CP Enhancement Layer calibrated against SAFLII court judgments.

  • All General pack inclusions
  • CP Birth Injury Enhancement Layer
  • GMFCS staging & life expectancy analysis
  • Consciousness & general damages assessment
  • PHC negotiation lever analysis
  • Calibrated against SAFLII judgments
  • POPIA compliant · zero data retention

Not sure which tier applies to your matter?

Contact Jurie at jurie@ramus.co.za for a full quotation on your matter.

* FX approximations based on indicative exchange rates. Actual rates quoted in ZAR. True conversion rates will appear on your invoice.

Behind RAMUS™
JG

Jurie Groenewald

Commercial Attorney (25+ years) · DiSAC Accredited Mediator · Creator of RAMUS™ and the Creative Pivot™ framework

Commercial AttorneyDiSAC Accredited
Important: The Mediation Readiness Score, risk ratings, ZOPA range, and all numerical assessments generated by RAMUS™ are structured analyses of conditions — not predictions, guarantees, or representations of outcome. Actual mediation outcomes depend on numerous factors including party behaviour, new information disclosed during the process, and the quality of facilitation. RAMUS™ is a preparation tool that supports but never replaces the mediator's professional judgment.

Walk in prepared. Walk out with a settlement.

Send your brief and receive a comprehensive 9-section assessment pack — typically within 24 hours.